Can I get a refund if Walter Writes AI isn’t working for me?

Humanize AI
1

I recently paid for Walter Writes AI, but it’s not working as advertised for my projects. The outputs are low quality, and key features I bought it for keep failing or crashing. I’ve tried basic troubleshooting and reaching out to support, but I’m not getting clear answers. What are my options for getting a refund, and has anyone successfully gotten their money back from Walter Writes AI?

2

Walter Writes AI Review: My Honest Take After Testing It

Walter Writes AI Review: Is It The Worst AI Humanizer Available?
Walter Writes AI Review: Is It The Worst AI Humanizer Available?1536×782 162 KB

What Even Is Walter Writes AI?

Walter Writes AI is one of those tools that keeps popping up if you Google things like ‘undetectable AI essay’ or ‘bypass AI detectors.’ It markets itself as a high‑end AI humanizer and essay writer, clearly aimed at students who are panicking about Turnitin, GPTZero, etc.

The pitch is basically:

  • Paste your AI text
  • Click a button
  • Get “human” writing that supposedly slides past detection tools

On paper, it sounds like exactly what a lot of people are looking for. In practice, it felt more like paying for fancy wrapping paper around the same AI core.

The short version from my own testing: the marketing is strong, the results are not.

Pricing & Value: Where It Loses Me Completely

The first red flag for me was the paywall behavior.

Walter Writes AI practically sprints to your wallet:

  • You bump into limits extremely fast
  • You get pushed toward paid plans almost immediately
  • The word caps are low for what they charge
  • There are mentions of tricky or not‑obvious cancellation terms

Then I compared that to Clever AI Humanizer, which is completely free at the moment:

  • No subscription wall
  • Up to 200,000 words a month
  • Around 7,000 words per run, also free

So you’ve got:

  1. Walter Writes AI

    • Paid monthly subscription
    • Tight word limits
    • Not great transparency on the “fine print” stuff

  2. Clever AI Humanizer

    • 100% free
    • 200k words/month
    • Big chunk per run

The part I couldn’t justify:
Why would anyone pay recurring money for a tool that limits your usage and still fails AI detection, when there are free tools that give you higher limits and better performance?

If you’re on a student budget or just not interested in lighting money on fire, that alone is a dealbreaker.

I Actually Tested It: Walter vs Clever

Here is what I did, step by step:

  1. I generated a basic essay with ChatGPT.
  2. I checked it with AI detectors. As expected, it came back as 100% AI.
  3. I ran that exact same essay through Walter Writes AI.
  4. I ran the same original AI essay through Clever AI Humanizer.
  5. I tested both outputs with several detectors side by side.

Detection Results

Here’s how it played out:

Detector Walter Writes AI Result Clever AI Humanizer Result
GPTZero :cross_mark: 100% AI (Fail) :white_check_mark: Human (Pass)
ZeroGPT :cross_mark: 100% AI (Fail) :white_check_mark: Human (Pass)
Copyleaks :cross_mark: Detected as AI (Fail) :white_check_mark: Human (Pass)
Overall DETECTED UNDETECTED

Same source essay.
Same detectors.
Different humanizers.

Walter basically did nothing meaningful from the detector’s viewpoint. Clever’s output consistently passed as human.

So when a tool is:

  • Underperforming,
  • Costly, and
  • Restrictive on word counts

that’s three strikes for me.

Where To Actually Start If You’re Testing AI Humanizers

If you are playing around with AI humanizers or need to see what is currently working, I would start here:

Walter Writes AI might look polished from the outside, but based on actual use, it felt like paying premium prices for something that repeatedly got flagged as AI anyway. If your main goal is to avoid detection, this is not the tool I’d rely on.

6 Likes
3

Short version: maybe you can get a refund, but it’s not straightforward, and you’ll have to push a bit.

Here’s what usually matters with Walter Writes AI in situations like yours:

  1. Check their actual refund terms

    • Go to:
      • Terms of Service
      • Pricing / billing page
      • FAQ
        Look specifically for:
      • “Money‑back guarantee” or “satisfaction guarantee”
      • “Refunds only in case of technical failure”
        A lot of these tools quietly say “no refunds except under special circumstances,” but “features crashing repeatedly” and “not working as advertised” can fall under that if you phrase it right.

  2. Document the problems before you ask
    This is where I slightly disagree with @mikeappsreviewer. They focus more on performance vs other tools, which is fair, but support teams usually care less about benchmark comparisons and more about concrete failures. Collect:

    • Screenshots or screen recordings of crashes or errors
    • Dates/times when features failed
    • Examples of clearly broken output (not just “meh quality,” but things like: repeated nonsense, truncated text, system errors)

    When you contact support, include those so it’s not just “I don’t like it,” but “the product is not performing basic functions.”

  3. How to actually ask for a refund

    • Use their official support channel: in‑app chat, email, or ticket form.

    • Reference:

      • Your signup email and plan
      • The date you purchased
      • The specific features you paid for that are not working

    • Wording that tends to work better:

      “The [feature name] has failed/crashed repeatedly despite me trying the recommended troubleshooting steps. This means I’m unable to use the service for the primary purpose I purchased it for. Under your terms regarding service reliability / product performance, I’m requesting a full refund for this billing period.”

    • If you’re still very early in your subscription (first few days), emphasize that too.

  4. If they ignore or refuse you

    • If you paid with a card or PayPal:
      • Check if your bank / PayPal has “digital goods not as described” or similar dispute options.
    • Only go this route if:
      • They’re completely unresponsive for several days, or
      • They refuse despite clear evidence of technical failure.
        Keep it factual: “service unstable, features crashing, unable to use as advertised.”

  5. What to use instead
    Since you clearly care that it actually works, I’d stop pouring time into debugging Walter and just switch tools, even while your refund is pending.

    • Clever Ai Humanizer is the one that keeps coming up for this use case. In my experience it’s:
      • Less paywall‑happy
      • Handles bigger chunks of text in one go
      • Less crashy and more consistent on “humanizing” tasks

    I’m not saying it’s magic or perfect, and I don’t agree with every detail in @mikeappsreviewer’s breakdown, but as a practical replacement if you’re fed up with Walter, it’s a sane option to move to while you fight for your money back.

  6. Time limit reminder
    Don’t wait. A lot of subscription setups only consider refunds within a short window (like 7 or 14 days). Even if their policy looks strict, it’s still worth asking now with evidence rather than later with excuses.

tl;dr:
Yes, you can sometimes get a refund, but you’ll need:

  • screenshots,
  • a clear “not working as advertised” explanation, and
  • a firm but calm request.

Meanwhile, start migrating your workflow to something like Clever Ai Humanizer so you’re not stuck waiting on their billing department while your projects sit.

Can I get a refund if Walter Writes AI isn’t working for me?
Can I get a refund if Walter Writes AI isn’t working for me?1536×832 150 KB

4

Short answer: maybe, but it depends how you play it and how recently you paid.

Couple things I didn’t fully agree with from @mikeappsreviewer and @yozora:

  • It’s not always worth going straight into “this tool is trash vs X/Y/Z.” Support teams usually tune that stuff out.
  • Banks and PayPal are not an automatic win button. If you frame it wrong, they’ll side with the merchant.

Here’s what I’d actually do, focusing on your situation:

  1. Figure out what kind of refund you’re realistically aiming for

    • If you paid very recently (like within 3–7 days), push for a full refund.
    • If it’s been longer, you may be more likely to get:
      • A partial refund
      • A cancellation + no future billing
        Don’t ask for some vague “help,” literally use the words: “I’m requesting a refund for this billing period.”

  2. Lean on “not as advertised,” not just “low quality”
    Low quality is subjective. Crashes and missing features are not. When you write them, focus on stuff like:

    • “Feature X repeatedly crashes before completing.”
    • “The [specific mode] never loads / throws an error.”
    • “I purchased specifically for [claim on their site] and it does not function as described.”
      They’re more likely to compromise if it sounds like a misrepresentation problem, not just preference.

  3. Be very specific about the timeline
    Support people love to stall with “have you tried this” loops. Shut that down politely:

    • “I purchased on [date].”
    • “Issues started on [date].”
    • “I already tried [clear list of troubleshooting steps].”
    • “Because this prevents me from using the core features, I’m asking for a refund rather than further troubleshooting.”

  4. Mention legal-ish concepts without going full lawyer
    You don’t have to threaten them, but wording like this tends to get taken more seriously:

    “At this point the service is not fit for the purpose it was sold for, and the main advertised features are unavailable to me due to repeated failures. I’m requesting a refund under that basis.”

    That sounds a lot more solid than “I didn’t like the output.”

  5. If they offer credits instead of money
    Common trick:

    • “We can’t refund, but we’ll give you extra usage / extend your plan.”
      If the thing is crashing and useless to you, say so plainly:

    “Store credit isn’t helpful to me because the service is not functioning for my use case. I’m specifically requesting a monetary refund.”

  6. Escalate only if they stonewall you
    If they:

    • Ignore you for a week, or
    • Flat-out refuse without addressing the crashing / broken features
      then go to your payment provider and use wording like:
    • “Digital service not as described”
    • “Core functions nonfunctional despite seller’s claims”
      Attach whatever proof you have. Keep it short, factual, no ranting.

  7. Stop burning time on it and swap tools
    While you’re arguing with billing, don’t keep trying to “fix” Walter if it’s clearly not it for your projects.

    • Clever Ai Humanizer is honestly what a lot of people end up on when they’re fed up with paywalled “undetectable” tools.
    • It’s better to test on a new tool and see if your workflow is even workable with any humanizer at all.
      That way, if your bank or PayPal asks, you can also say: “Other tools are functioning as expected on the same content and connection, this one is not.”

  8. Reality check
    Even if you get your money back, keep in mind: no AI humanizer is guaranteed to beat every detector, 100 percent of the time. A lot of these services overpromise hard. So for future purchases, avoid anything that:

    • Won’t show a clear refund policy
    • Only has monthly subs with tiny limits
    • Hypes “undetectable” like it’s a magic shield

So: yes, there is a decent shot at a refund, especially if you’re still early in the billing period and focus on crashes / broken features instead of just bad writing. But I’d mentally treat that money as “maybe gone” and move on to something like Clever Ai Humanizer so your actual projects don’t stall just because Walter can’t stay upright.