I need to pick a WiFi analysis tool for troubleshooting coverage and performance issues in a small office and at home. I’m torn between NetSpot WiFi Analyzer App and Ekahau and not sure which one offers the best balance of accuracy, ease of use, and price. Can anyone with real-world experience using these tools share pros, cons, and which you’d recommend for both one-time surveys and ongoing monitoring?
I bounced between NetSpot and Ekahau for a while, so here is how it went for me without the marketing fluff.
I started with Ekahau because everyone in enterprise Wi-Fi keeps talking about it. It does a lot. You get heavy survey features, predictive design, planning for massive sites, all of that. The problem for me started with two things: price and time.
Price first. Ekahau felt aimed at big companies with real budgets. Licensing costs were way beyond what made sense for a smaller shop or a solo IT person. It felt fine if you manage hospitals, stadiums, airports, or have hundreds of APs. Once you drop below that size, the value gets blurry fast.
Then the learning curve. The tool goes deep, but it took me a while to stop fighting the interface. To get good results, I had to spend time on workflows, profiles, project structure, and tuning. It is solid if Wi-Fi design is your daily work. It felt heavy for quick site checks, SMB offices, and home networks that still need to be done right.
After some frustration, I switched to NetSpot and it fit better for the kind of jobs I deal with.
With NetSpot, I got the pieces I used most in Ekahau without the overhead:
• Heatmaps that make sense on the first try
• Signal level and noise breakdowns by area
• Easy walk-through surveys on a floor plan
• Quick checks for weak spots and channel issues
Setup took less time. I imported a floor plan, mapped a few reference points, walked the space, and had usable data without digging through menus or documentation. For small offices, coworking spaces, cafes, and what I would call “serious” home networks, it felt enough.
I used it, for example, on a 2-floor office with about 15 APs. The main issues were dead corners and overlapping channels from a neighbor. NetSpot gave me:
• Clear signal heatmaps
• Per-AP coverage
• Channel distribution in each room
From that, I moved two APs, dropped transmit power on a couple of them, and cleaned up channels. Took one visit and a follow-up check. No need to model walls in detail or run big predictive simulations.
That is where NetSpot seems to shine. It hits the 80 percent most people need:
• You want to see where Wi-Fi drops.
• You want to place or move APs with some data behind the decision.
• You want a visual you can show a manager or a client without having to explain twenty options.
If you are planning a large campus, multi-building warehouse, or high-density venue, Ekahau still makes sense. If you are not in that world, NetSpot feels more reasonable.
So for my use, NetSpot ended up as the better Wi-Fi survey and planning app:
There is a short video walkthrough here if you want to see it in action before installing anything:
1 Like
If your scope is small office plus home, you are already outside Ekahau’s sweet spot.
Quick way to decide:
- What you need
• Find dead zones and weak spots
• See which AP covers which area
• Spot bad channels and overlapping neighbors
• Fix “why is Zoom trash in this room” problems
NetSpot App handles all of that without a huge setup.
- When Ekahau makes sense
• Large sites with dozens or hundreds of APs
• Need predictive design before install
• Need detailed wall materials, capacity planning, client types
• WiFi work is your core job, not a side task
You will pay a lot more, plus spend time learning it. For one‑off or occasional surveys, the ROI is weak.
- When NetSpot App fits better
• Small office, like under ~20 APs
• Home with multiple APs or mesh
• You want heatmaps, signal/noise, per‑AP coverage, channel view
• You need to be productive the same day you install it
This is where I slightly disagree with @mikeappsreviewer. Ekahau is nice even on small sites if you already own it and know it well. The problem is getting to that point. For your use case, that extra depth turns into overhead, not value.
-
Practical workflow with NetSpot App for you
• Import simple floor plan for home and office
• Walk each area once for passive survey
• Look at RSSI heatmap, aim for at least around ‑65 dBm where people work
• Check channel map, fix overlapping 2.4 GHz, spread 5 GHz channels
• Move APs or tweak power, then do a short resurvey -
OS and hardware note
• Check if you want macOS, Windows, or Android support
• Dedicated hardware sensors for Ekahau cost extra
• NetSpot App uses your device radio, which is enough for what you described
If your main goal is troubleshooting coverage and performance in a small office and home, go with NetSpot App. If one day you start designing warehouses or campuses, revisit Ekahau then.
You’re not crazy for being torn, both tools are legitimately good, just aimed at different universes.
I mostly agree with @mikeappsreviewer and @espritlibre, but I think they underplay one angle: how often you’ll actually use this thing.
If your world is “small office + home” and you’re not living and breathing RF design every day, Ekahau is kind of like buying a full-blown CAD suite because you want to rearrange the furniture in your living room. It works, it’s powerful, but half the features will sit there mocking you.
Where I slightly disagree with them: Ekahau can be worth it even on small sites only if:
- You’re planning to go deeper into WiFi engineering as a career, or
- You’re doing paid consulting where you need formal reports, capacity analysis, and fancy visuals to justify invoices.
If you’re just:
- Hunting dead spots
- Fixing Zoom dropouts in 2 rooms
- Cleaning up channels in a 10–20 AP office
- Checking mesh placement at home
then the Netspot App is the saner choice. You’ll actually open it more than once a quarter, which matters more than theoretical power.
Also, one practical thing not mentioned enough: mental load. Ekahau wants you to think in terms of RF models, wall types, client capacity, SLAs. Netspot App lets you think in terms of “this room is red, that room is green, change something.” For your use case, that’s not “less professional,” it’s just more aligned.
The only reasons I’d tell you to bite the bullet and go Ekahau anyway:
- You already know you’ll be doing larger warehouses / campuses soon
- Your boss is paying and expects “enterprise-grade” everything
- You enjoy spending evenings reading WiFi design docs instead of just fixing the problem and moving on
Otherwise, Netspot App hits the balance you’re asking about: good enough analysis, quick to use, inexpensive enough that it doesn’t feel ridiculous for a home and a small office.
If your scope is “small office + home,” you’re basically choosing between a scalpel and a full surgical robot.
Where I slightly disagree with others:
@espritlibre, @himmelsjager and @mikeappsreviewer are right that Ekahau is overkill in many cases, but they lean a bit too hard on size alone. The real dividing line is whether you need capacity planning and repeatable documentation. A 20‑AP law firm with VIP video calls can justify Ekahau more than a 60‑AP warehouse that just wants barcode scanners to not drop.
For what you described, here is how I’d frame it:
Netspot App: Pros
-
Very fast to value
You can go from “installed” to useful heatmaps in one visit without studying RF theory. Great if Wi‑Fi is part of your job, not your identity. -
Good visual storytelling
The heatmaps and per‑AP views are simple enough that managers and non‑tech people get it instantly. Perfect for “here’s why we need to move this AP.” -
Strong fit for your scale
Small office, home, co‑working, cafés: it nails signal coverage, channel overlap, basic interference. That covers most real‑world fixes you will actually do. -
Lower cost & lighter licensing stress
You are not locking yourself into enterprise‑style annual spend for something you might use a few times a quarter.
Netspot App: Cons
-
Limited for deep design work
If you want full predictive design with detailed wall attenuation, multi‑floor RF modeling or high‑density tuning for hundreds of clients, you will hit its ceiling. -
Less “future proof” for a Wi‑Fi career
If your goal is to become a full‑time Wi‑Fi engineer and live in RF modeling, Ekahau is the tool most of that world speaks. -
Reporting depth
You get enough to justify changes, but not the very granular, highly customizable reports some consultants like to hand to picky clients.
When Ekahau actually makes sense for you
I would only argue for Ekahau in your case if at least one of these is true:
- You plan to pivot into paid Wi‑Fi consulting in the next 6–12 months.
- Your company is okay with the budget and explicitly wants “enterprise‑grade” tooling for audits and long‑term capacity planning.
- You have multiple locations coming (warehouses, multiple branches, or a campus‑style environment) where predictive design before cabling is important.
If none of those is happening, Ekahau will spend a lot of time closed while you fix real problems with far simpler tools.
Practical decision shortcut
Ask yourself:
-
“Do I mostly need to fix bad spots and clean up channels where people already complain?”
→ Netspot App. -
“Do I need to design networks from scratch, justify budgets with detailed simulation, and model client capacity?”
→ Consider Ekahau.
Given your specific use case (small office + home, troubleshooting coverage and performance), I’d pick Netspot App without feeling like you are “settling.” It hits the right balance of capability vs cost vs time, and you are far more likely to actually use it regularly, which is what matters.